It must have been over 15 years ago when I first began making
modest monthly donations to Opportunity International Australia. Opportunity is
a microfinance organisation that provides small loans to help people in
low-income countries break the poverty cycle by starting their own small
businesses. It also offers its clients other financial services including
savings accounts and insurance.
What attracted me to Opportunity the most was the potential
for money donated to be recycled to help more people as loans are repaid. Over
the years I have obtained satisfaction from the information that Opportunity has
sent me about transformations that have occurred in the lives of individuals
who were being helped. There have been many heart-warming stories about
donations being used in ways that help poor people, mainly women, to build better
lives for themselves and their families.
Nevertheless, the sceptical old economist in me has been
muttering that he would like to see such stories backed by more empirical data
showing how the economic and social prospects of Opportunity’s clients have
improved as a result of the help that they have been given.
The enthusiasm of development economists for microfinance
seems to have waxed and waned over the years, but recent research findings suggest
that it can be an effective way to expand the opportunities available to people
living in poverty who would otherwise be unable to obtain credit (or would have
difficulty servicing loans at interest rates reflecting the high credit risks
conventionally perceived to be involved). One particular study I have in mind, undertaken
by Shahidur Khandker and Hussain Samad for the World Bank, uses over 20 years
of panel data for Bangladesh. This study found that microcredit programmes
resulted in increases in income, expenditure and net wealth, and increased
participation in education. The results suggest that microcredit has been a particularly
effective tool for reducing poverty among women.
In terms of global microfinance, the Opportunity
International Network is a relatively small player, but a recent Social Performance Report indicates that it now has 3.6 million loan clients and its gross
loan portfolio stands at $US 841.6 million. As indicated in the chart below,
most of those loans have been made to India and other parts of Asia.
Those priorities seem appropriate from an Australian supporter’s
perspective, but I would personally like to see Opportunity also establish a
presence in Papua New Guinea.
Information in the Social Performance Report also indicates to
me that Opportunity has been fairly effective in targeting assistance to those
whose needs are greatest. A high proportion of new clients have been living in
poverty, using $2.50 per day as the benchmark; new clients often have had no
previous access to loans or savings facilities with a financial institution;
and 94% of clients are women.
Information on the impact of loans and other assistance is
currently patchy, but efforts are being made to develop appropriate indicators.
The Social Performance Report provides evidence of a substantial reduction in
the proportion of clients in poverty in the Philippines and of substantial job
creation in clients’ businesses in African countries. One statistic which must
imply impressive economic performance by clients is the repayment rate of loans
– it is reported that 98% of Opportunity loans are repaid.
Rather than rounding off this post with a conclusion that
any two-handed economist might be proud of, I want to do something I have never
done before. I urge readers to spare $6 or more (hopefully much more) each month to make a regular donation to Opportunity. You
might get a warm inner glow by giving money to other charities, but it would be
hard to find anything more deeply satisfying than giving a hand-up to poverty-stricken
people who seeking to build better futures for themselves and their families.
No comments:
Post a Comment