The results of the latest Human Freedom Index by Ian Vásquez and Tanja Porčnik (published by
the Fraser Institute and several other policy think tanks) have surprised some
people.
Among the social media comments was one from a person who
had lived in several different parts of the world who was surprised that
Scandinavian countries ranked so highly in terms of personal freedom. (Sorry, I
can’t find the link.) I wasn’t surprised to see Hong Kong in first place in the
overall freedom ranking, since the methodology gives equal weight to economic
freedom and personal freedom and does not include voting rights as a component
of personal freedom. It was a surprise, however, to see the United States ranked
so lowly, in 20th place overall and in 31st place in terms of personal
freedom.
In order to better comprehend the rankings of particular
countries I have used conditional formatting to prepare the table below showing
the components of personal freedom and economic freedom ratings for the 50
countries assessed to have the highest overall freedom ratings. For each
component index green denotes a relatively high rating, yellow a moderate rating
and red a relatively low rating.
It seems that the US has a relatively low rating on rule of
law and freedom of movement. The US
ratings on the three components of the rule of law index - procedural justice, civil
justice and criminal justice – are all rated as more than 20% below the world’s
best practice. (Data are from the World Justice Project, an independent non-profit
organization, originally founded in 2006 as a presidential initiative of
the American Bar Association.) The US’s low rating on freedom of movement
is attributable to restrictions on foreign movement i.e. freedom of citizens to
leave and return to their country. (Data are from the CIRI Human Rights Data
Project.)
Another surprising item highlighted in the table is the
relatively low rating of New Zealand on freedom of religion. This low rating
apparently reflects some kind of restriction on freedom to establish religious
organisations.
The relationship between economic freedom and personal
freedom is interesting. The chart shown below suggests a fairly strong
correlation, but there are some interesting outliers.
It seems to me that economic freedom and personal freedom
are so strongly linked that it is inherently difficult to maintain high
economic freedom without high personal freedom and vice versa. It is reasonable
to predict that Singapore’s high level of economic freedom will continue to
support relatively high economic growth, which in turn will support the development of emancipative values and greater personal freedom in the decades ahead. In
the case of Slovenia and Italy I am not sure whether we are more likely to see
a rise in economic freedom or a decline in personal freedom.
It is really surprising to know the worlds most developed and powerful country,USA is ranked 20 and 30 in terms of personal and economic freedom. But my doubt is, whenever, the president of USA delivers a speech in and outside the country, he stress so much on freedom, rights, justice and open society. What might be wrong in the country if the policy is focused on the personal and economic freedom, but the outcome seems to be going in another direction. I would really like to know this.
ReplyDeleteThat is a very good question, Yeshi.
ReplyDelete