I would be happy to declare myself a fan of the OECD’s
Better Life index if it included an appropriate indicator of freedom. Perhaps
the authors might argue that freedom is adequately covered by “civic
engagement”. However, that seems like arguing that it is not possible for
people to suffer persecution from government when they have the right to vote. I
don’t think J S Mill would have been impressed:
“The limitation … of the power of government over
individuals, loses none of its importance when the holders of power are
regularly accountable to the community, that is, to the strongest party
therein” (On Liberty, Chapter I).
Perhaps the authors of the index see freedom as a
characteristic of the social environment that people desire because it enables
them to have greater life satisfaction, rather than as one that contributes
directly to the quality of life. I don’t buy that argument. Humans have a
passion to control their own lives (even though many have no qualms in voting to have governments restrict the freedom of others). I predict that many users of the Better
Life index would give a higher weight to individual freedom than to many of the other
items included in the index, if they were given the opportunity to do so. (One
of the features of the Better Life index is the ability of users to assign whatever
weights they choose to the variables that are included in the index.)
It is possible, however, that freedom makes little difference
to country rankings. That might happen if freedom indexes are highly correlated
with life satisfaction. I am focusing attention here on the relationship
between freedom and life satisfaction because most of the 11 components of the
OECD’s Better Life Index are correlated with life satisfaction. Civic
engagement is one of the exceptions. The others are education, safety and
work-life balance.
The freedom indexes I have chosen to consider are the Fraser
Institute’s economic freedom and personal freedom indexes. Both of those
indexes are highly correlated with life satisfaction (r = 0.73 for personal
freedom and r = 0.61) in OECD countries. A regression analysis shows both
variables to have a positive (significantly greater than zero) influence on
life satisfaction, together explaining 68% of the variation in life
satisfaction among OECD countries. (The data and results are available from the author.)
The relationships between life satisfaction and the two
freedom indexes are shown in the charts below.
There seems to have been a fairly strong tendency for people
who argue that government policies should be directed toward raising average
life satisfaction to advocate policies involving restrictions on freedom. Such
people have been barking up the wrong tree. The countries with highest
average life satisfaction are those with the least restrictions on economic and
personal freedom.
Postscript:
I neglected to refer to a recent article by Boris Nikolaev entitled "Economic Freedom and the Quality of Life". This article provides a fairly extensive discussion of the relationship between economic freedom and the quality of life at a national level.
Postscript:
I neglected to refer to a recent article by Boris Nikolaev entitled "Economic Freedom and the Quality of Life". This article provides a fairly extensive discussion of the relationship between economic freedom and the quality of life at a national level.
No comments:
Post a Comment