Think about how you felt yesterday. Did you feel much pain,
worry, sadness, stress or anger? If you felt less of those negative emotions than
the world average, then do you think it would be reasonable to predict that
your experience of positive emotions might be higher than the world average?
The relevant positive experiences are smiling and laughing a lot, feeling
enjoyment, well-rested and treated with respect, and learning or doing
something interesting.
Apparently that prediction is not as reasonable as I thought
it would be. People in countries where average levels of negative emotion are
relatively low do not necessarily have relatively high average levels of
positive emotion. This is apparent in the Figure below which has been drawn
from data from recent polls conducted by the Gallup organisation.
The Figure does show an inverse correlation between positive
and negative emotion, but most of the action is at the upper end of negative
emotion. It seems to be much less common for people with high negative emotion
to also experience high positive emotion than it is for people who experience
low negative emotion to also experience low positive emotion.
Interestingly, the chart also shows that the average of
positive emotion for people in Bhutan - the home of Gross National Happiness (GNH)
- is low by comparison with both of its giant neighbours, China and India.
Gallup has suggested that Bhutan’s low score on positive emotion is
attributable to the fact that the percentage of the population who feel that they
are treated with a “great deal of respect” was the lowest for all countries
included in the 2013 survey. Perhaps this reflects the restrictions on
individual liberty imposed by the government in pursuit of its GNH objective.
It is also possible that the GNH objective gives participants in happiness
surveys an incentive to use their responses to tell the government that they
are not happy with its performance.
However, the main point I want to make concerns the salient
characteristics of the countries which combine low negative emotion with low
positive emotion or unusually high positive emotion. Most of the countries in
the first category were formerly members of the Soviet Union (shown with red
diamonds). By contrast, most Latin American countries (shown with purple
diamonds) have unusually high positive emotion scores.
The most likely explanation of the different emotional
experiences of people in the former Soviet Union and Latin America is the development of shared frames of mind (cultural framing). Sonja Lyubomirsky has observed that expressions of
happiness or success in Russia are often perceived as inviting envy,
resentment, and suspicion, at least partly because there is a cultural belief
in Russia that anyone who is happy or successful might have used immoral means
for achieving these states. (Reported in a recent article on happiness aversion
by Mohsen Joshanloo and Dan Weijers). I guess such beliefs could have been
reinforced by living under communism and the regimes that have followed the
fall of communism. It is also possible that negative emotions would be
understated in a culture where people had incentives to adopt a “must not
complain” attitude to life.
With regard to Latin America, Jon Clifton, the author
of the report of the Gallup survey suggests:
“That so many people are reporting positive emotions in
Latin America at least partly reflects the cultural tendency in the region to
focus on the positives in life”.
There is evidence (for example in a report by Eduardo Loro) that
when people in Latin America are asked about their health, they tend to report
a higher level of satisfaction than is warranted, given objective indicators of
their health status.
The existence of such a cultural bias does not mean that the
high positive emotion reported for Latin America is not genuinely felt. Research
by Mohsen Joshanloo provides some evidence of lower happiness aversion in Latin
America than in many other parts of the world. It seems reasonable to predict
that the high positive emotion in Latin America would provide health benefits
e.g. lower rates of hypertension, as in other parts of the world (see research by David Blanchflower and Andrew Oswald). Unfortunately, I haven’t been able to
find studies that control for the relevant variables to confirm whether that is
the case. There are studies suggesting that rates of hypertension are relatively
high in some Latin American countries, but that seems to be attributable to obesity and
other risk factors.
No comments:
Post a Comment